Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
SAFWAY STEEL SCAFFOLD CO. ET AL. v. INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT COMMISSION ET AL.
This is a petition by the State Insurance Fund for the annulment of an order of the Industrial Accident Commission denying petitioner's application for a lien against any unpaid award of compensation allowed applicants in the matter of Helmick v. Safway Steel Scaffold Company and State Compensation Insurance Fund, No. L. A. 49–468.
The essential facts are these:
June 11, 1940, respondent Industrial Accident Commission made an award in favor of Alyce Helmick for the wrongful death of her husband, finding that the Safway Steel Scaffold Company had been guilty of serious and willful misconduct. June 13, 1940, petitioner asked respondent commission for a stay of execution, which request was denied. Thereafter Alyce Helmick filed a certified copy of the findings and award of June 11, 1940, of respondent commission as a judgment with the clerk of the superior court and by levying on Safway Steel Scaffold Company's bank account obtained $654.78. March 10, 1941, on rehearing respondent commission revoked its previous finding that petitioner herein, the Safway Steel Scaffold Company, was liable for serious and willful misconduct and made a finding that said petitioner was not liable for serious and willful misconduct.
Since it appears from the record in the present case that petitioner, State Compensation Insurance Fund, has not paid out any money whatsoever under the original award to Alyce Helmick, said petitioner has not been injured and has no claim for reimbursement.
For the foregoing reasons, the order of the respondent, Industrial Accident Commission, is affirmed.
McCOMB, Justice.
MOORE, P. J., and W. J. WOOD, J., concurred.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: Civ. 13752.
Decided: November 05, 1942
Court: District Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 2, California.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)