SECURITY FIRST NAT BANK OF LOS ANGELES v. SOUTHERN CITRUS ASS OF REDLANDS ET AL (1941)

District Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 2, California.

SECURITY–FIRST NAT. BANK OF LOS ANGELES v. SOUTHERN CITRUS ASS'N OF REDLANDS ET AL.

Civ. 13124.

Decided: October 14, 1941

Julius J. Novack, of San Bernardino, for appellant. Helgoe & Hart, of Los Angeles, for respondent.

The facts of this case are the same as those set forth in our opinion in Security–First National Bank v. Hauer, 117 P.2d 952, this day filed. Defendant has attempted to appeal from the judgment entered on January 8, 1941, in favor of plaintiff. That judgment, however, was regularly set aside on defendant's own motion on January 20, 1941. As a result the attempted appeal from that judgment is ineffectual.

The purported appeal from the judgment and order is, therefore, dismissed.

MOORE, Presiding Justice.

WOOD and McCOMB, JJ., concurred.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network