WHITE v. WHITE (1940)

District Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 2, California.

WHITE v. WHITE.

Civ. 12269

Decided: March 25, 1940

Arthur J. Mullen, Raymond Tremaine, and Franklin L. Knox, Jr., all of Los Angeles, for appellant. T.W. Ward, of Pasadena, for respondent.

This is a motion for diminution of record by appellant to have the transcript on appeal changed by including certain testimony alleged to have been improperly omitted from the engrossed bill of exceptions and to have excluded from the engrossed bill of exceptions certain testimony included therein.

Appellant twice moved the trial court to correct the record in the same particulars as he now seeks to have this court correct the same. In each instance the trial court denied the motions.

Appellant has failed to establish to our satisfaction that the rulings of the trial court were incorrect. Therefore, section 652 of the Code of Civil Procedure is inapplicable, and appellant's motion for diminution of the record is denied.

McCOMB, Justice.

We concur: MOORE, P.J.; WOOD, J.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network