NUFFER v. WARE (1939)

District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, California.

NUFFER v. WARE, Sheriff–Coroner.
HOOPER v. THORNE et al.

Civ. 2366

Decided: September 19, 1939

John J. Dillon, of Culver City, for appellant. Kenneth A. White, of Los Angeles, for respondent in intervention.

This is a motion to dismiss the appeal. Notice of appeal from the judgment in the above-entitled matter was filed by Charles W. Hooper, intervener, on June 24, 1939, with the clerk of Imperial county. From the certificate of the clerk it appears that since filing of the notice of appeal no proceeding was ever instituted for the preparation of a bill of exceptions or a transcript under section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure, and that the time to institute the same has expired. Service of the notice of motion to dismiss was duly made.

Under the authority of Robinson v. Pismo Oil Dome Co., 31 Cal.App.2d 716, 88 P.2d 725, the appeal is dismissed.

GRIFFIN, Justice.

I concur: MARKS, Acting P.J.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network