BECKJORD v. TRAEGER (1935)

District Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 2, California.

BECKJORD v. TRAEGER, Sheriff, et al.

Civ. 8779.

Decided: January 26, 1935

George M. Breslin and Henry G. Bodkin, both of Los Angeles, for appellants.

The petition for rehearing is denied. The opinion is amended in the following particulars:

On page 523 of 39 P.(2d), column 2, at line 18 et seq. the following is stricken out: “Prior to the date of the lease Beckjord had leased the same premises to Silas F. and Margaret F. Slusher. The Slushers had the right to assign their lease.” And the following is substituted instead thereof: “Prior to the date of such lease Beckjord had entered into an agreement regarding a lease of the same premises to Silas F. and Margaret F. Slusher. The Slushers had the right to assign their interests.”

On the same page at lines 3 and 4 of the last paragraph a period is placed after the word “into” and the rest of the sentence is stricken out.

Add as the last sentence of the opinion the following: “Appellant claims that the fixtures, alleged to be unlawfully seized and converted, were given too high a valuation by the trial court. We think the trial court was better able to fix such value than we are.”

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network