REINGOLD v. NEW JERSEY INS CO OF NEWARK (1938)

District Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 2, California.

REINGOLD v. NEW JERSEY INS. CO. OF NEWARK, N.J.

Civ. 12029

Decided: October 26, 1938

Saul S. Klein and Bertram S. Harris, both of Los Angeles, for appellant. Thornton, Menzies & Penney, of Los Angeles, for respondent.

This case comes on for hearing upon motion of the respondent to dismiss the appeal because of the failure of appellant to file a transcript of the record or brief within the time required by law. He has accompanied the motion with a certificate of the clerk of the superior court showing that no record herein has been prepared by him.

The motion is good; the appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network