Skip to main content

REINGOLD v. NEW JERSEY INS CO OF NEWARK (1938)

District Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 2, California.

REINGOLD v. NEW JERSEY INS. CO. OF NEWARK, N.J.

Civ. 12029

Decided: October 26, 1938

Saul S. Klein and Bertram S. Harris, both of Los Angeles, for appellant. Thornton, Menzies & Penney, of Los Angeles, for respondent.

This case comes on for hearing upon motion of the respondent to dismiss the appeal because of the failure of appellant to file a transcript of the record or brief within the time required by law. He has accompanied the motion with a certificate of the clerk of the superior court showing that no record herein has been prepared by him.

The motion is good; the appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Thank you. Your response has been sent.

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law
REINGOLD v. NEW JERSEY INS CO OF NEWARK (1938)

Docket No: Civ. 12029

Decided: October 26, 1938

Court: District Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 2, California.

Get a profile on the #1 online legal directory

Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.

Sign up

Learn About the Law

Get help with your legal needs

FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.

Learn more about the law
Copied to clipboard