ISETT v. FREES (1938)

District Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 2, California.

ISETT v. FREES et al.

Civ. 11778.

Decided: March 23, 1938

William C. Ring and James L. Crawford, both of Los Angeles, for appellant. W. I. Gilbert, of Los Angeles, for respondents.

Upon submission of the motion to dismiss the above–entitled cause, the presiding justice in open court made the following statement:

This case comes before the court on a motion to dismiss. The appellant has not appeared in the case; that is, there has been no transcript or brief filed within the time provided by law. The motion is good and it is granted. In re Yahne, 193 Cal. 386, 224 P. 452; In re Wignall, 193 Cal. 387, 224 P. 452.

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network