GRAYBIEL v. CONSOLIDATED ASS (1936)

District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, California.

GRAYBIEL v. CONSOLIDATED ASS'N, Limited, et al.

Civ. 1806.

Decided: June 11, 1936

Halbert & Stone, of Porterville, for appellant. Samuel Schwartz, of Los Angeles, for respondent.

This is a motion by respondent to dismiss this appeal upon the ground that appellant failed to file his points and authorities within the time specified in rule 1 of the Rules of the Supreme Court and the District Courts of Appeal. The penalty for breach of this rule is found in rule 5.

The clerk's transcript on appeal was filed on April 11, 1936, the notice of motion to dismiss on May 14, 1936, and the appellant's opening brief on June 6, 1936. The motion to dismiss was calendared on June 9, 1936. The filing of the brief before the hearing of the motion has been held sufficient compliance with the rules to justify the denial of the motion. Toth v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 113 Cal.App. 55, 297 P. 564.

The motion to dismiss is denied.

MARKS, Justice.

We concur: BARNARD, P. J.; JENNINGS, J.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network