COPE v. STECKEL (1935)

District Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 2, California.

COPE v. STECKEL et al.

Civ. 9032.

Decided: January 25, 1935

Paul Taylor, of Los Angeles, for petitioner. Ray L. Chesebro, F. Von Schrader, and Arthur Loveland, all of Los Angeles, for respondents.

Appellant petitions for a rehearing setting forth that a brief on behalf of respondents was filed by permission after the case was submitted and presenting argument and authorities which he contends should be considered as affecting our determination of this appeal. We have considered the points urged and cases cited, and are of the opinion that they do not support any view other than that already expressed, and that our decision on rehearing would be that already expressed.

The petition for rehearing is therefore denied.

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network