Skip to main content


District Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 1, California.

PEOPLE of the State of California, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Floyd C. BRITTON et al., Defendants; C. R. Russell, Defendant and Appellant. *

Cr. 2636.

Decided: August 31, 1935

Frederic H. Vercoe, Public Defender, and Ellery E. Cuff, Deputy Public Defender, both of Los Angeles, for appellant. U. S. Webb, Atty. Gen., and Frank Richards, Deputy Atty. Gen., for the People.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of his conviction for the crime of “kidnaping for the purpose of robbery,” and urges the identical points and presents the same argument thereon that were presented by him to this court in an appeal from another judgment that followed his conviction for a like offense committed under circumstances similar to those which were shown to have existed in the instant case.

For the reasons assigned in the appeal to which reference hereinbefore has been had, to wit, People v. Britton (Cal. App.) 48 P.(2d) 704, it is ordered that the judgment be, and it is, affirmed.

HOUSER, Justice.

We concur: CONREY, P. J.; EDMONDS, Justice pro tem.

Was this helpful?

Thank you. Your response has been sent.

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law

Docket No: Cr. 2636.

Decided: August 31, 1935

Court: District Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 1, California.

Get a profile on the #1 online legal directory

Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.

Sign up

Learn About the Law

Get help with your legal needs

FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.

Learn more about the law
Copied to clipboard