PEOPLE v. BRITTON (1935)

District Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 1, California.

PEOPLE of the State of California, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Floyd C. BRITTON et al., Defendants; C. R. Russell, Defendant and Appellant. *

Cr. 2636.

Decided: August 31, 1935

Frederic H. Vercoe, Public Defender, and Ellery E. Cuff, Deputy Public Defender, both of Los Angeles, for appellant. U. S. Webb, Atty. Gen., and Frank Richards, Deputy Atty. Gen., for the People.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of his conviction for the crime of “kidnaping for the purpose of robbery,” and urges the identical points and presents the same argument thereon that were presented by him to this court in an appeal from another judgment that followed his conviction for a like offense committed under circumstances similar to those which were shown to have existed in the instant case.

For the reasons assigned in the appeal to which reference hereinbefore has been had, to wit, People v. Britton (Cal. App.) 48 P.(2d) 704, it is ordered that the judgment be, and it is, affirmed.

HOUSER, Justice.

We concur: CONREY, P. J.; EDMONDS, Justice pro tem.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network