EUREKA CASUALTY CO CORPORATION PETITIONER LOS ANGELES SURETY CO INC CORPORATION PETITIONER AND APPELLANT v. THE MUNICIPAL COURT OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES ET AL DEFENDANTS AND RESPONDENTS (1934)

District Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 2, California.

EUREKA CASUALTY CO. (A CORPORATION), PETITIONER; LOS ANGELES SURETY CO., INC. (A CORPORATION), PETITIONER AND APPELLANT, v. THE MUNICIPAL COURT OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES ET AL., DEFENDANTS AND RESPONDENTS.

Civ. 8190.

Decided: January 12, 1934

A. Brigham Rose, of Los Angeles, for appellant. Everett W. Mattoon, Co. Counsel, and Robert A. Cushman, Deputy Co. Counsel, both of Los Angeles, for respondents.

An application for a writ of mandate directing the respondent municipal court to set aside an order forfeiting bail bonds and entries of judgments thereon having been denied by the superior court, the petitioner appealed.

The questions presented having been determined in Seaboard Surety Corp. v. Municipal Court, 208 Cal. 596, 283 P. 289; Los Angeles Surety Co., Inc., v. Municipal Court, 111 Cal. App. 133, 295 P. 591, and Eureka Casualty Co. v. Municipal Court (Cal. App.) 28 P.(2d) 709, the petition cannot be granted.

The order is affirmed.

CRAIG, Justice.

We concur: STEPHENS, P. J.; ARCHBALD, Justice, pro tem.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network