CALIFORNIA TREASURE BOX v. SUPERIOR COURT IN AND FOR LOS ANGELES COUNTY (1934)

District Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 2, California.

CALIFORNIA TREASURE BOX v. SUPERIOR COURT IN AND FOR LOS ANGELES COUNTY.

Civ. 9595.

Decided: November 13, 1934

Frank L. Simons, of Los Angeles, for petitioner. Everett W. Mattoon, County Counsel, and S. V. O. Prichard, Deputy County Counsel, both of Los Angeles, for respondents.

This proceeding is one in mandamus to require the discharge of an attachment issued out of an action in the superior court. It is alleged in the complaint that corporate stock was purchased by the plaintiff under defendant's false pretenses and that plaintiff promptly rescinded. The prayer is for the return of the purchase money paid, with interest.

The facts bring the issue within the principles expressed in McCall v. Superior Court (Cal. Sup.) 36 P.(2d) 642.

The alternative writ is discharged, and the peremptory writ is denied.

STEPHENS, Presiding Justice.

We concur: CRAIL, J.; WILLIS, Justice pro tem.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network