Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
PEOPLE v. MYERS et al.
The defendants were jointly charged with the crime of burglary. A jury found each defendant guilty of burglary in the first degree, and, from the ensuing judgment, each defendant has appealed. The transcript was filed in this court on August 1, 1934, and the cause regularly placed on the calendar for September 11, 1934, for oral argument. No appearance was made on behalf of the appellant Rackley, no brief has been filed for him, and the attorney who acted for him in the trial court has sent in a letter stating that no brief would be filed. The Attorney General has moved to affirm the judgment as to Rackley under section 1253 of the Penal Code.
The judgment against the defendant Rackley is affirmed.
BARNARD, Presiding Justice.
We concur: MARKS, J.; JENNINGS, J.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: Cr. 174.
Decided: October 11, 1934
Court: District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, California.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)