Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
PEOPLE v. SCHEFFEL.
In the above-entitled matter the Attorney General has moved that the judgment and order appealed from be affirmed as no briefs have been filed by appellant.
Although no briefs have been filed we have read the entire record. The evidence amply sustains the verdict of the jury finding the defendant guilty of violating chapter 339, § 1 (page 696), of the Statutes of 1923 as charged in count 1 of the indictment filed in the lower court. The record does not disclose any reversible error.
Judgment affirmed.
SCHMIDT, Justice pro tem.
We concur: NOURSE, P. J.; STURTEVANT, J.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: Cr. 1799.
Decided: July 10, 1934
Court: District Court of Appeal, First District, Division 2, California.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)