EX PARTE STOVALL v. << (1934)

District Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 2, California.

EX PARTE STOVALL.

Cr. 2493.

Decided: January 22, 1934

Loeb L. Cossack, of Los Angeles, for petitioner. Buron Fitts, Dist. Atty., and Tracy Chatfield Becker, Deputy Dist. Atty., both of Los Angeles, for respondent.

Petitioner was regularly bound over to superior court for trial for pandering. He complains to this court that there was not sufficient evidence produced at the hearing to legally justify his being held for trial.

There is sufficient evidence to justify the belief that such a crime was committed in his residence. There is evidence of his implication and knowledge.

The writ is discharged.

STEPHENS, Presiding Justice.

We concur: CRAIG, J.; ARCHBALD, Justice pro tem.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network