HAMMOND v. STANLEY (1935)

District Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 2, California.

HAMMOND et al. v. STANLEY et al.

Civ. 10525.

Decided: November 04, 1935

Voorhees & Voorhees, of Los Angeles, for appellants. George W. Burch, Jr., of Los Angeles, for respondents.

The sole question involved on this appeal is whether section 2924 1/212 of the Civil Code, as added by St. 1933, p. 1674, § 8, applies to trust deeds and notes which were executed prior to its effective date. If the section is applicable to such paper, the judgment should be affirmed; if it does not apply to such paper, the judgment should be reversed. This court has taken the position that the Code section does not apply to such paper which was executed prior to its effective date, and the reasons are set forth in the recent case of Bankers Life Co. v. Canterbury et al. (Cal. App.) 50 P.(2d) 83.

Judgment reversed.

CRAIL, Presiding Justice.

We concur: WOOD, J.; McCOMB, Justice pro tem.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network