Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
SCANLON v. J. J. MOORE & CO. et al.
Plaintiff sued under the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C.A. § 688, to recover damages for the death of a merchant seaman. The cause was tried to a jury which returned a verdict for plaintiff against both defendants.
They prosecute this appeal on the ground that the vessel on which decedent was employed was owned and operated by the United States through its War Shipping Board, under a written contract designating these defendants as agents only. Appropriate instructions concerning this issue were proposed by defendants and refused by the trial court. At the time of the trial the responsibilities of those operating under such a contract were in some doubt because of Hust v. Moore-McCormack Lines, 328 U.S. 707, 66 S.Ct. 1218, 90 L.Ed. 1534 and Caldarola v. Eckert, 332 U.S. 155, 67 S.Ct. 1569, 91 L.Ed. 1968.
Following the judgment in our case, which was entered June 15, 1948, the United States Supreme Court, on June 27, 1949, entered judgment in Cosmopolitan Shipping Company, Inc., v. McAllister, 337 U.S. 783, 69 S.Ct. 1317, 1326, 93 L.Ed. 1692, definitely holding that seamen employed under such an agency contract ‘became employees of the United States and not of the general agent’ and that an agent under such a contract was ‘not liable to a seaman for injury caused by the negligence of the master or crew of such a vessel.’
This is precisely the case presented here.
Judgment reversed with directions to enter judgment for defendants.
NOURSE, Presiding Justice.
GOODELL and DOOLING, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: Civ. 14073.
Decided: April 24, 1950
Court: District Court of Appeal, First District, Division 2, California.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)