Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JASON DANIEL COONS, Defendant and Appellant.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
OPINIONFACTS
It was alleged in a criminal complaint filed April 12, 2010, that appellant, Jason Daniel Coons, committed a violation of Penal Code section 4573.6 (possession of marijuana in county jail) and that he had served two separate prison terms for prior felony convictions (Pen.Code, § 667.5, subd. (b)). Pursuant to a plea agreement on April 28, 2010, the People dismissed the prior prison term enhancement allegations, appellant pled guilty to the substantive offense, and the court imposed a two-year prison term.
On July 21, 2010, appellant filed a notice of appeal and requested that the court issue a certificate of probable cause (Pen.Code, § 1237.5). The court granted that request the following day.
Appellant's appointed appellate counsel has filed an opening brief, which summarizes the pertinent facts, with citations to the record, raises no issues, and asks that this court independently review the record. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Appellant has not responded to this court's invitation to submit additional briefing.
On January 27, 2010, appellant was an inmate in Tuolumne County jail. On that date, a deputy sheriff on duty in the jail smelled a strong odor of marijuana coming from appellant's cell. After appellant was removed from the cell, the deputy searched it and found a small quantity of marijuana.
DISCUSSION
Following independent review of the record, we have concluded that no reasonably arguable legal or factual issues exist.
DISPOSITION
The judgment is affirmed.
FOOTNOTES
THE COURT * FN*. Before Wiseman, Acting P.J., Dawson, J., and Kane, J.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: F060603
Decided: April 14, 2011
Court: Court of Appeal, Fifth District, California.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)