Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
TANYA B., Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, Real Party in Interest.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
Tanya B. challenges the November 29, 2010 order of the juvenile court, denying reunification services with her biological child, minor Vincent B., on the basis that she was not served with written notice. (Welf. & Inst.Code, § 291, subds. (d), (e).)
Vincent was born in December 2009. In September 2010, the Department of Children and Family Services investigated allegations of Tanya's general neglect of Vincent. On October 6, 2010, the Department removed Vincent from Tanya's care based on the report of the children's services worker that Tanya had admitted current use of methamphetamine and marijuana and disclosed acts of domestic violence perpetrated against her by Vincent's alleged father.1
On November 29, 2010, the juvenile court found that notice had been given to Tanya, sustained the petition, ordered Vincent suitably placed, ordered no family reunification services for Tanya, and set a permanency planning hearing for March 28, 2011.
In its letter filed in lieu of an answer to the petition for extraordinary writ, the Department states that Tanya was not served with written notice of the recommendation of the Department that no reunification services be offered, she never appeared in the juvenile court, no counsel had been appointed for her, and the Department is not opposed to granting Tanya's petition. We hereby grant the petition and remand the matter for counsel to be appointed and for the juvenile court to conduct a new dispositional hearing after proper notice.
DISPOSITION
The petition is granted. The juvenile court's November 29, 2010 order terminating reunification services is vacated. The matter is remanded and the juvenile court shall (1) appoint counsel for Mother, Tanya B., and (2) conduct a new dispositional hearing after proper notice.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
We concur:
FOOTNOTES
FN1. Vincent's alleged father, Joshua B., who has a 12-year history of illicit drug use, is not a party to this petition.. FN1. Vincent's alleged father, Joshua B., who has a 12-year history of illicit drug use, is not a party to this petition.
ROTHSCHILD, J. CHANEY, J.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: B230001
Decided: March 16, 2011
Court: Court of Appeal, Second District, California.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)