Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
PEOPLE of the State of California, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Arthur SCHULZE and Frank John Schutz, Defendants. Arthur Schulze, Defendant and Appellant.
Appellant Arthur Schulze and one Frank John Schutz (note the difference in spelling of surnames) were jointly tried and convicted of violation of § 288a, Penal Code. A police officer observed them engaged in the forbidden act and immediately arrested both. A jury was waived and the cause submitted upon the transcript of the preliminary hearing. At its conclusion the court ruled: ‘Find each defendant guilty as charged.’ A probation report was ordered and at a later hearing the court announced that it had read that report, probation was denied and appellant was committed to the state prison for the term prescribed by law.
The argument of appellant's only brief is based upon this assertion: ‘Thereafter the Court reduced the charge as to Schutz to a violation of section 650 1/2 of the Penal Code and fined him $100.00. As to Appellant the Court denied probation and sentenced him to the State Prison.’ There is no basis in the record for this statement. Shortly after the opening brief was filed appellant made a motion to augment the record so as to afford factual foundation for an argument that appellant was prejudiced by the alleged leniency shown his co-defendant. Specifically, the motion sought inclusion in the instant record of part of the judgment with respect to a different defendant; ‘[t]o include therein the judgment of the trial court with respect to the defendant Frank John Schutz, and to include therein the oral proceedings in open court with reference to the pronouncement of said judgment against Frank John Schutz.’ The motion was opposed and denied. This leaves appellant with no substantial factual basis for his argument.
The transcript contains only a suggestion of the alleged fact. At the time of sentencing appellant's attorney made this assertion: ‘Your Honor will recall, in the co-defendant's case that matter was reduced to a lesser offense and then it was granted probation. I realize there is a difference between the two reports but——’. The court interrupted, saying: ‘Certainly there is a difference in the reports and in the individuals.’ Amplifying this in the briefs was not permissible. ‘Matters not presented by the record cannot be considered on the suggestion of counsel in the briefs. [Citations.] The procedure to augment the record is set forth in Rule 33(b), Rules on Appeal.’ People v. Hernandez, 150 Cal.App.2d 398, 402, 309 P.2d 969, 972. ‘Statements of counsel in briefs are not part of the record on appeal.’ Gantner v. Gantner, 39 Cal.2d 272, 278, 246 P.2d 923, 928.
We add, by way of dictum, that the facts asserted by appellant, if established, would not spell prejudicial error with respect to him. The punishment inflicted upon appellant was lawful. Legally it is of no consequence to him whether his co-defendant received undeserved leniency or not.
Judgment affirmed.
ASHBURN, Justice.
FOX, P. J., and HERNDON, J., concur.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: Cr. 6431.
Decided: April 07, 1959
Court: District Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 2, California.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
FindLaw for Legal Professionals
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)