VALENTIN v. VALENTIN (1949)

District Court of Appeal, First District, Division 2, California.

VALENTIN v. VALENTIN.

Civ. 14002.

Decided: July 01, 1949

Lelia R. Leep, San Francisco, for appellant. Ferriter & Purcell, San Francisco, for respondent.

Appellant's motion to augment the record is granted and the clerk of the Superior Court is directed to forward to the clerk of this court the following documents:

Affidavit for writ of execution to issue, filed March 22, 1948;

Writ of Execution issued thereon by the Clerk of the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the City and County of San Francisco, and the Return of the Sheriff of said County endorsed thereon;

Notice of Motion for Reappraisement, filed April 19, 1948.

It further appearing that one or more of such documents may be lost or destroyed as to any such document this order is conditioned upon the appellant proceeding pursuant to section 1045, Code of Civil Procedure, to secure an order from the Superior Court authorizing the use of a copy thereof.

DOOLING, Acting Presiding Justice.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network