SCULLY v. ROSANOFF (1940)

District Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 2, California.

SCULLY v. ROSANOFF, Director of Department of Institutions, et al.

Civ. 12741

Decided: July 23, 1940

A. Brigham Rose, Paul Angelillo, and Lucien A. Sauvage, all of Los Angeles, for appellant. Earl Warren, Atty. Gen., and Alberta Belford, Deputy Atty. Gen., for respondents.

The respondent having served and filed his motion to dismiss the appeal in the above-entitled matter, supported by a certificate of the clerk of the superior court setting forth the facts required by rule VI of this court, and it appearing that more than five months have elapsed since the filing of the notice of appeal, and it appearing that the notice of appeal was filed on the 29th day of December, 1939, and that no notice to prepare the clerk's transcript has been filed, and that no transcript has been filed.

It is hereby ordered that this appeal be, and it hereby is, dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network