US v. Ralph, 06-1293
Revocation of defendant's supervised release is affirmed over claims that the district court erroneously relied on the inconsistent testimony of one government witness in revoking his supervised release, and that insufficient evidence existed that he failed to timely report an arrest to justify revocation of his supervised release.
- Decided 03/30/2007
- Published 03/30/2007
SMITH, Circuit Judge., Before MELLOY, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
United States Eighth Circuit
Jeffrey J. Rosanswank, Federal Public Defender's Office, Cape Girardeau, MO, for Appellant., John Robert Ralph, Farmington, MO, pro se.
Keith D. Sorrell, U.S. Attorney's Office, Cape Girardeau, MO, for Appellee.