Read US v. Ralph, 06-1293

Revocation of defendant's supervised release is affirmed over claims that the district court erroneously relied on the inconsistent testimony of one government witness in revoking his supervised release, and that insufficient evidence existed that he failed to timely report an arrest to justify revocation of his supervised release.

Appellate Information

• Decided 03/30/2007
• Published 03/30/2007

Judges

• SMITH, Circuit Judge., Before MELLOY, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Eighth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Jeffrey J. Rosanswank, Federal Public Defender's Office, Cape Girardeau, MO, for Appellant., John Robert Ralph, Farmington, MO, pro se.


• For Appellees:
  
• Keith D. Sorrell, U.S. Attorney's Office, Cape Girardeau, MO, for Appellee.