United States Sixth Circuit
US v. Herrera-Zuniga, 08-1540
Defendant's sentence for illegally reentering the U.S. is affirmed where: 1) the District Court had the authority to reject the Sentencing Guidelines on policy grounds; and 2) because the Guidelines are advisory only, the particular methodology set forth in U.S.S.G. section 4A1.3 is not binding.
Appellate Information
- Decided 07/08/2009
- Published 07/08/2009
Judges
- Before: COLE and CLAY, Circuit Judges; CLELAND, District Judge.
Court
- United States Sixth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- ARGUED: Richard D. Stroba, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Grand Rapids, Michigan, for Appellant. Jennifer L. McManus, Assistant United States Attorney, Grand Rapids, Michigan, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Richard D. Stroba, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Grand Rapids, Michigan, for Appellant. Donald Daniels, Assistant United States Attorney, Grand Rapids, Michigan, for Appellee.