AMMEX, INC. v. COX, 01-2392
Because plaintiff's pre-enforcement challenge to the applicability of the Michigan Consumer Protection Act is not ripe, and the judgment of the district court is affirmed.
- Decided 12/03/2003
- Published 12/03/2003
Before BATCHELDER and ROGERS, Circuit Judges; RUSSELL, District Judge.
United States Sixth Circuit
David D. Smyth III (briefed), William W. Koegel, Jr., Steptoe & Johnson, Washington, DC, Craig L. John (argued), Dykema Gossett, Bloomfield Hills, MI, for Appellant.
Tracy A. Sonneborn (argued and briefed), Office of the Attorney General of Michigan Consumer Protection Division, Lansing, MI, for Appellee.