Read US v. Crudup, 05-4048

A 36-month term of imprisonment imposed after the district court revoked defendant's supervised release is affirmed over his claim that the court-s variance from the 5 to 11-month advisory sentencing range to the 36-month statutory maximum sentence was unreasonable.

Appellate Information

• Argued 05/26/2006
• Decided 08/07/2006
• Published 08/07/2006

Judges

• Before WILKINS, Chief Judge, SHEDD, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Court

• United States Fourth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• ARGUED:  Jane Ely Pearce, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant.  Christine Witcover Dean, Assistant United States Attorney, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.   ON BRIEF:  Thomas P. McNamara, Federal Public Defender, Stephen C. Gordon, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant.  Frank D. Whitney, United States Attorney, Anne M. Hayes, Assistant United States Attorney, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.