Chacko v. Patuxent Inst., 04-1577
A plaintiff in a Title VII employment discrimination suit fails to exhaust his administrative remedies where his administrative charges reference different time frames, actors, and discriminatory conduct than the central factual allegations in his formal suit.
- Decided 11/29/2005
- Published 11/29/2005
Before WILKINSON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and ROBERT J. CONRAD, JR., United States District Judge for the Western District of North Carolina, sitting by designation.
United States Fourth Circuit
ARGUED: Alan Douglas Eason, Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Bryan Anthony Chapman, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. ON BRIEF: J. Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant.