US v. BARILE, 00-4926
At defendant's trial for making materially false statements to the FDA, the district court erred in determining that prior statements of a key government witness were consistent; case remanded for determination of whether defendant can lay foundation to demonstrate that prior inconsistent statements are attributable to witness.
- Argued 12/06/2001
- Decided 04/18/2002
- Published 04/18/2002
Before WILKINS and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
United States Fourth Circuit
ARGUED: Joseph Sedwick Sollers, III, King & Spalding, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Bryan Edwin Foreman, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland; Steven Neil Gersten, Trial Attorney, Office of Consumer Litigation, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Eugene M. Pfeifer, Jeffrey S. Bucholtz, King & Spalding, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Stephen M. Schenning, United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.