United States Fourth Circuit

ResetAA Font size: Print

US v. BARILE, 00-4926

At defendant's trial for making materially false statements to the FDA, the district court erred in determining that prior statements of a key government witness were consistent; case remanded for determination of whether defendant can lay foundation to demonstrate that prior inconsistent statements are attributable to witness.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 12/06/2001
  • Decided 04/18/2002
  • Published 04/18/2002

Judges

  • Before WILKINS and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Court

  • United States Fourth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • ARGUED:  Joseph Sedwick Sollers, III, King & Spalding, Washington, D.C., for Appellant.  Bryan Edwin Foreman, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland;  Steven Neil Gersten, Trial Attorney, Office of Consumer Litigation, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.   ON BRIEF:  Eugene M. Pfeifer, Jeffrey S. Bucholtz, King & Spalding, Washington, D.C., for Appellant.  Stephen M. Schenning, United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More