United States Second Circuit
SADALLAH v. CITY OF UTICA, 03-9055
Statements made by defendant, which allegedly damaged plaintiff's reputation and business, do not constituted a "stigma plus" violation of plaintiff's constitutional rights where plaintiff failed to allege a tangible injury sufficient to make out a constitutional claim under the "stigma plus" doctrine.
Appellate Information
- Decided 09/03/2004
- Published 09/03/2004
Judges
- SOTOMAYOR, Circuit Judge., Before: NEWMAN, KEARSE and SOTOMAYOR, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Second Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- Dennis B. Schlenker, Esq., Albany, NY, for Plaintiffs-Appellees., Joseph P. Giruzzi, Esq., Assistant Corporation Counsel for the City of Utica (John W. Dillon, Corporation Counsel for the City of Utica, on the brief), Utica, NY, for Defendants-Appellants.