United States Second Circuit

Indemnification of legal expenses and denial of leave to amend complaint are affirmed upon finding that both the causes of action in the original complaint and those in the proposed amended complaint were either time barred under New York's statute of limitations or failed to state claims upon which relief could be granted.

Appellate Information

• Decided 04/07/2003
• Published 04/07/2003

Judges

• MINER, Circuit Judge., Before:  WALKER, Chief Judge, and OAKES and MINER, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Second Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Mark R. Kravitz,Wiggin & Dana LLP, New Haven, CT (Victor A. Bolden, Wiggin & Dana, LLP, New Haven, CT, Philip Halpern, Collier, Halpern, Newberg, Nolletti & Bock, LLP, White Plains, NY, on the briefs), for Plaintiff-Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Paul M. Dodyk, Cravath, Swaine & Moore, New York, NY, for Defendants-Appellees.