LERNER v. FLEET BANK, N.A., 01-7755
Lack of RICO standing does not divest a district court of jurisdiction over the action because RICO standing, unlike other standing doctrines, is sufficiently intertwined with the merits of a RICO claim that such a rule would turn the underlying merits questions into jurisdictional issues.
Appellate Information
- Decided 01/22/2003
- Published 01/23/2003
Judges
-
SOTOMAYOR, Circuit Judge., Before: STRAUB and SOTOMAYOR, Circuit Judges, and GOLDBERG, Judge.
Court
-
United States Second Circuit
Counsel
-
For Appellant:
-
G. Robert Blakey,Notre Dame Law School (James B. Zane, Edward S. Rudofsky, Arlene H. Schechter, on the brief), Notre Dame, IN, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
-
For Appellees:
-
Richard F. Ziegler, Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton (David M. Meisels, of counsel), New York, NY, for Defendant-Appellee Fleet Bank, N.A., Celia G. Barenholtz, Kronish Lieb Weiner & Hellman LLP (Chaya Weinberg-Brodt, of counsel), New York, NY, for Defendant-Appellee Republic National Bank of New York., Allen C. Wasserman, Owen & Davis PC, New York, NY, for Defendant-Appellee Sterling National Bank and Trust Company of New York.