United States Tenth Circuit

In a contract dispute between corporations, the district court's exercise of personal jurisdiction over defendant is affirmed where: (1) the defendant's acts or contacts implicated Utah under the Utah long-arm statute; (2) a nexus existed between the claims and the defendant's contacts; and (3) federal due process was satisfied.

Appellate Information

• Decided 11/09/2005
• Published 11/09/2005

Judges

• EBEL, Circuit Judge., Before EBEL, Circuit Judge, HENRY, Circuit Judge, and WHITE, District Judge.

Court

• United States Tenth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• J. Mark Gibb, Durham Jones & Pinegar, P.C., Salt Lake City, Utah (Stephen Marshall, Durham Jones & Pinegar, P.C., Salt Lake City, Utah, with him on the briefs), for Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee., Gifford W. Price, Mackey Price Thompson & Ostler, Salt Lake City, Utah (Gregory N. Jones, Mackey Price Thompson & Ostler, Salt Lake City, Utah, with him on the briefs), for Defendant/Cross-Appellant and Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant.