| Description | Date | Docket # |
| Brother v. State of Texas Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas Criminal Law & Procedure, Evidence Denial of defendant's motion to suppress is affirmed where the arresting officer 1) had reasonable suspicion to stop defendant's car, and 2) had... |
06/29/2005 | 1820-02 |
| Russeau v. State of Texas Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas Criminal Law & Procedure, Sentencing In a capital murder case, defendant's punishment is remanded for a new punishment hearing under Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 44.29(c). |
06/29/2005 | 74, 466 |
| Saenz v. State of Texas Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas Constitutional Law, Criminal Law & Procedure The Court of Appeals did not err in holding that defendant had been subjected to multiple punishments for the same offense, in violation of the Double... |
06/29/2005 | 61-04 |
| Ex Parte McCurry Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas Criminal Law & Procedure, Habeas Corpus, Sentencing Denial of habeas corpus relief to defendant is affirmed over his claim that his confinement to a private correctional facility as a condition of his... |
06/29/2005 | 74, 969 |
| Reyna v. State of Texas Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas Criminal Law & Procedure, Evidence The trial judge's exclusion of appellant's evidence is affirmed where appellant, as the proponent of the evidence, was required to offer the evidence... |
06/29/2005 | 0255-04 |
| Halprin v. State of Texas Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas Criminal Law & Procedure, Sentencing Death row inmate raises nineteen meritless points of error on direct appeal. |
06/29/2005 | 74, 721 |
| Garland v. State of Texas Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas Criminal Law & Procedure, Sentencing The Court of Appeals incorrectly held that defendant's negotiated plea of nolo contendere was involuntary and that his sentence was illegal. |
06/29/2005 | 1231-04 |
| Griffith v. State of Texas Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas Criminal Law & Procedure, Sentencing Under Code of Criminal Procedure Article 42.12, section 9, a defendant may waive his right to a presentence investigation report during the initial... |
06/29/2005 | 1121-04 |
| Hampton v. State of Texas Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas Criminal Law & Procedure Defendant's acquittal to the charge of aggravated sexual assault does not bar retrial for sexual assault. |
06/23/2005 | 0179-04 |
| Sanchez v. State of Texas Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas Criminal Law & Procedure The appropriate test for harm when the State is allowed to improperly commit jurors to a set of facts is set out in Rule 44.2(b) of the Texas Rules of... |
06/23/2005 | 1230-04 |