CWCAPITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC, etc., respondent, v. GREAT NECK TOWERS, LLC, et al., appellants.
-- October 17, 2012
Lazer, Aptheker, Rosella & Yedid, P.C., Melville, N.Y. (Russell L. Penzer and Giuseppe Franzella of counsel), and June Diamant, Cedarhurst, N.Y., for appellants (one brief filed).Venable LLP, New York, N.Y. (Edward A. Smith, and Gregory A. Cross and Heather Deans Foley, pro hac vice, of counsel), for respondent.
In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Warshawsky, J.), dated May 5, 2010, which denied their motion pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(3) to dismiss the complaint for lack of standing.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
On or about October 24, 2006, the defendants executed a note in the amount of $46.5 million in favor of CIBC, Inc. The note was secured by a mortgage on commercial real property located in Great Neck. Through various assignments and mergers, and a Pooling and Servicing Agreement (hereinafter the PSA), ownership of the note and mortgage was transferred to the Registered Holders of J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2006–CIBC17, Commercial Mortgage Pass–Through Certificates, Series 2006–CIBC17 (hereinafter the Trust), Bank of America, N.A. (hereinafter Bank of America), became the Trustee for the Trust, and the plaintiff, CWCapital Asset Management, LLC (hereinafter CWCapital), became the Special Servicer of the loan.
In October 2009 the defendants allegedly defaulted on the note. In January 2010 CWCapital, solely in its capacity as Special Servicer for Bank of America, as Trustee for the Trust, commenced this action to foreclose the mortgage. The defendants moved pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(3) to dismiss the complaint for lack of standing. The Supreme Court denied the motion. The defendants appeal, and we affirm.
Contrary to the defendants' contention, CWCapital has standing to commence this foreclosure action because the complaint identified the Trust as the owner of the note and mortgage, the action was expressly maintained in CWCapital's capacity as servicing agent, and, in the PSA, Bank of America's predecessor, as the Trustee for the Trust, delegated to CWCapital the authority to act with respect to the subject mortgage (see CWCapital Asset Mgt. LLC v. Charney–FPG 114 41st St., LLC, 84 A.D.3d 506, 506, 923 N.Y.S.2d 453; Fairbanks Capital Corp. v. Nagel, 289 A.D.2d 99, 100, 735 N.Y.S.2d 13).
The defendants' remaining contentions are without merit.
Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendants' motion pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(3) to dismiss the complaint for lack of standing.