Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York ex rel. Howard ENGEL, Appellant, v. Darwin LaCLAIR, as Superintendent of Franklin Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Feldstein, J.), entered August 6, 2008 in Franklin County, which denied petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70, without a hearing.
In 2003, petitioner was convicted of assault in the second degree and sentenced to a prison term of three years with two years of postrelease supervision. In January 2008, petitioner was charged with various violations of his postrelease conditions. He pleaded guilty to one of the charges and, as a result, he was ordered held until the expiration date of his period of supervision. The Administrative Law Judge directed, however, that if petitioner completed the Willard Drug Treatment Program his postrelease supervision would be restored. Petitioner commenced this proceeding challenging the timeliness of his transfer to that program. Supreme Court dismissed his petition, prompting this appeal.
Petitioner has already been released from custody due to the expiration of his period of postrelease supervision. As such, “habeas corpus relief is no longer available and the proceeding must be dismissed as moot” (People ex rel. McAdoo v. Taylor, 31 A.D.3d 847, 848, 818 N.Y.S.2d 847 [2006]; see Matter of Horton v. Travis, 18 A.D.3d 922, 923, 793 N.Y.S.2d 778 [2005] ).
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.
PETERS, J.P.
ROSE, LAHTINEN, KANE and STEIN, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: March 26, 2009
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)