Skip to main content

WHITLEY v. NEW YORK, 396 U.S. 10 (1969)

Reset A A Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

WHITLEY v. NEW YORK(1969)

No. 268

Argued: Decided: October 13, 1969

Appeal dismissed.

Henry B. Rothblatt and Emma A. Rothblatt for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


STOECKLE v. WISCONSIN, <flCite id="/us-supreme-court/396/10#">396 U.S. 10 </flCite> (1969) 396 U.S. 10 (1969) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

STOECKLE v. WISCONSIN, 396 U.S. 10 (1969)

396 U.S. 10

STOECKLE v. WISCONSIN
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
No. 272, Misc.
Decided October 13, 1969

41 Wis. 2d 378, 164 N. W. 2d 303, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. [396 U.S. 10, 11]  

Copied to clipboard