SUMRALL v. KIDD

Reset A A Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

JONES v. CALIFORNIA(1969)

No. 1072

Argued: Decided: March 10, 1969

263 Cal. App. 2d 818, 70 Cal. Rptr. 13, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

SUMRALL v. KIDD, <flCite id="/us-supreme-court/394/215#">394 U.S. 215 </flCite> (1969) 394 U.S. 215 (1969) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

SUMRALL v. KIDD, 394 U.S. 215 (1969)

394 U.S. 215
SUMRALL v. KIDD ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI. No. 1167, Misc.
Decided March 10, 1969.

Vacated and remanded.

Lawrence A. Aschenbrenner and Elliott C. Lichtman for appellant.

Acting Solicitor General Friedman, Acting Assistant Attorney General Eardley, Morton Hollander, and Robert V. Zener for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The judgment of the District Court is vacated and the cause is remanded in order that the District Court may enter a fresh decree from which the appellant may, if he wishes, perfect a timely appeal to the Court of Appeals. Moody v. Flowers, 387 U.S. 97 . [394 U.S. 215, 216]

FindLaw Career Center

Select a Job Title

Post a Job | Careers Home