WESTSIDE LIQUOR CO. v. KIRBY

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

LOUISIANA EDUC. COMM. FOR NEEDY CHILDREN v. POINDEXTER, (1968)

No. 284

Argued:     Decided: October 14, 1968

Affirmed.

Leander H. Perez and Luke A. Petrovich for appellants.

Solicitor General Griswold and Assistant Attorney General Pollak for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

WESTSIDE LIQUOR CO. v. KIRBY, <a href="https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/393/17.html">393 U.S. 17 </a> (1968) 393 U.S. 17 (1968) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

WESTSIDE LIQUOR CO. v. KIRBY, 393 U.S. 17 (1968)

393 U.S. 17

WESTSIDE LIQUOR CO. v. KIRBY, DIRECTOR,
DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL OF CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT. No. 324.
Decided October 14, 1968.

259 Cal. App. 2d 511, 66 Cal. Rptr. 434, appeal dismissed.

Harold Easton for appellant.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, and Lynn Henry Johnson, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [393 U.S. 17, 18]  

FindLaw Career Center

    Select a Job Title


      Post a Job  |  Careers Home

    View More