GOLDMAN v. NEW YORK

Reset A A Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

21 N. Y. 2d 152, 234 N. E. 2d 194, appeal dismissed.

Robert E. Goldman and Stephen R. Wiener for appellant.

Frank S. Hogan and H. Richard Uviller for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS are of the opinion that the judgment should be reversed.

RHODES v. COOK, <a href="https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/392/643.html">392 U.S. 643 </a> (1968) 392 U.S. 643 (1968) ">

392 U.S. 643

RHODES v. COOK.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON.
No. 1283.
Decided June 17, 1968.

72 Wash. 2d 436, 433 P.2d 677, appeal dismissed.

E. A. Niemeier, Frank A. Bauman, John K. Mallory, Jr., and R. Michael Duncan for appellant.

John F. Wilson for appellee.

Harry R. Calbom, Jr., for Pay'n Pak Stores, Inc., et al., as amici curiae, in support of appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS dissents. [392 U.S. 643, 644]

Select a Job Title