JENKINS v. BIRZGALIS

Reset A A Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

JENKINS v. BIRZGALIS(1966)

No. 1495

Argued: Decided: June 6, 1966

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. [384 U.S. 435, 436]

DAUGHERTY v. TENNESSEE, <flCite id="/us-supreme-court/384/435#">384 U.S. 435 </flCite> (1966) 384 U.S. 435 (1966) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

DAUGHERTY v. TENNESSEE, 384 U.S. 435 (1966)

384 U.S. 435
DAUGHERTY v. TENNESSEE.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE.
No. 1435, Misc.
Decided June 6, 1966.

216 Tenn. 666, 393 S. W. 2d 739, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Appellant pro se.

George F. McCanless, Attorney General of Tennessee, and Thomas E. Fox, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

FindLaw Career Center

Select a Job Title

Post a Job | Careers Home