BAER v. NEW YORK(1966)
Isadore Greenberg for appellant.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
UNITED STATES v. CLAYTON, COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE OF NORTH CAROLINA.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
NORTH CAROLINA. No. 1115.
Decided May 2, 1966.
Solicitor General Marshall, Acting Assistant Attorney General Roberts, I. Henry Kutz and Robert A. Bernstein for the United States.
The appeal is dismissed. [384 U.S. 154, 155]