Skip to main content

ALBAUGH v. TAWES, 379 U.S. 27 (1964)

Reset A A Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

HOOPER v. DUNCAN(1964)

No. 393

Argued: Decided: November 09, 1964

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 95 Ariz. 305, 389 P.2d 706.

Alfred C. Marquez for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


ALBAUGH v. TAWES, <flCite id="/us-supreme-court/379/27#">379 U.S. 27 </flCite> (1964) 379 U.S. 27 (1964) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

ALBAUGH v. TAWES, 379 U.S. 27 (1964)

379 U.S. 27

ALBAUGH v. TAWES, GOVERNOR OF MARYLAND, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND.
No. 481.
Decided November 9, 1964.

233 F. Supp. 576, affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed. [379 U.S. 27, 28]  

Copied to clipboard