DIXIE FEED & SEED CO., v. BYRD(1964)
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: ___ Tenn. App. ___, 376 S. W. 2d 745.
W. Neil Thomas, Jr., for appellants.
H. Keith Harber for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
BOINEAU ET AL. v. THORNTON, SECRETARY OF STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
SOUTH CAROLINA. No. 483.
Decided October 19, 1964.
235 F. Supp. 175, affirmed.
Ralph E. Becker for appellants.
Daniel R. McLeod, Attorney General of South Carolina, and Clarence T. Goolsby, Jr., and Everett N. Brandon, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. [379 U.S. 15, 16]