SALAS v. TEXAS(1963)
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 365 S. W. 2d 174.
Joseph A. Calamia for appellant.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [375 U.S. 15, 16]
STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF KANSAS v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS.
No. 217.
Decided October 14, 1963.
216 F. Supp. 376, affirmed.
Byron M. Gray and Robert Londerholm for appellant.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Robert B. Hummel, Robert W. Ginnane and Stanton P. Sender for the United States et al.
Harvey Huston and Roth A. Gatewood for railroad appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.