Skip to main content

WATT v. WAINWRIGHT, 372 U.S. 769 (1963)

Reset A A Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

WATT v. WAINWRIGHT(1963)

No. 575

Argued: Decided: April 22, 1963

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Petitioner pro se.

Richard W. Ervin, Attorney General of Florida, and A. G. Spicola, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 .


ARNOLD v. DIRECTOR, FLORIDA DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS, <flCite id="/us-supreme-court/372/769#">372 U.S. 769 </flCite> (1963) 372 U.S. 769 (1963) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

ARNOLD v. DIRECTOR, FLORIDA DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS, 372 U.S. 769 (1963)

372 U.S. 769

ARNOLD v. DIRECTOR, FLORIDA DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA.
No. 771, Misc.
Decided April 22, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 145 So.2d 478.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 . [372 U.S. 769, 770]  

Copied to clipboard