CEPERO v. PUERTO RICO

Reset A A Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

CLINTON v. JOSHUA HENDY CORP.(1960)

No. 59

Argued: Decided: October 10, 1960

Reported below: 277 F.2d 447.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed.


CEPERO v. PUERTO RICO, <flCite id="/us-supreme-court/364/292#">364 U.S. 292 </flCite> (1960) 364 U.S. 292 (1960) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

CEPERO v. PUERTO RICO, 364 U.S. 292 (1960)

364 U.S. 292

CEPERO v. PUERTO RICO ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT
OF NEW YORK. No. 98, Misc.
Decided October 10, 1960.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed.


WACHTEL v. NEW YORK, <flCite id="/us-supreme-court/364/292#">364 U.S. 292 </flCite> (1960) 364 U.S. 292 (1960) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

WACHTEL v. NEW YORK, 364 U.S. 292 (1960)

364 U.S. 292

WACHTEL v. NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE APPELLATE DIVISION OF THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK,
SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT. No. 144, Misc.
Decided October 10, 1960.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [364 U.S. 292, 293]