FORD v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA

Reset A A Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

FORD v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA(1960)

No. 255

Argued: Decided: October 10, 1960

184 F. Supp. 129, affirmed.

Jacob Kossman for appellant.

Anne X. Alpern, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, and Frank P. Lawley, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

VAUGHN v. OHIO, <flCite id="/us-supreme-court/364/291#">364 U.S. 291 </flCite> (1960) 364 U.S. 291 (1960) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

VAUGHN v. OHIO, 364 U.S. 291 (1960)

364 U.S. 291
VAUGHN v. OHIO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 24, Misc.
Decided October 10, 1960.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 170 Ohio St. 360, 164 N. E. 2d 739.

Appellant pro se.

C. Watson Hover and Harry C. Schoettmer for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. [364 U.S. 291, 292]

FindLaw Career Center

Select a Job Title

Post a Job | Careers Home