DEITLE v. UNITED STATES

Reset A A Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

DEITLE v. UNITED STATES(1960)

No. 759

Argued: Decided: June 27, 1960

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 274 F.2d 117.

Petitioner pro se.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Wilkey, Beatrice Rosenberg and Robert G. Maysack for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court for a hearing at which petitioner should be present.

De GROAT v. NEW YORK, <flCite id="/us-supreme-court/364/284#">364 U.S. 284 </flCite> (1960) 364 U.S. 284 (1960) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

De GROAT v. NEW YORK, 364 U.S. 284 (1960)

364 U.S. 284
De GROAT v. NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT OF ULSTER COUNTY, NEW YORK.
No. 956, Misc.
Decided June 27, 1960.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 8 App. Div. 2d 664, 185 N. Y. S. 2d 775.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. [364 U.S. 284, 285]

FindLaw Career Center

Select a Job Title

Post a Job | Careers Home