BABCOCK v. CALIFORNIA(1958)
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Austin Clapp for appellant.
Roger Arnebergh and Philip E. Grey for appellee.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
NORTH WESTERN-HANNA FUEL CO. ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA.
Decided May 19, 1958.
161 F. Supp. 714, affirmed.
John F. Donelan and Lee Loevinger for appellants.
Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Hansen, Charles H. Weston, Robert W. Ginnane and Charlie H. Johns for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, appellees.
Curtis H. Berg for the Canadian National Railway Co. et al., appellees.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. [356 U.S. 581, 582]