FIRST NAT BANK OF GULFPORT, MISS, v. ADAMS(1922)
[258 U.S. 362, 363] Mr. Wm. H. Watkins, of Jackson, Miss., for petitioner.
Mr. J. B. Harris, of Jackson, Miss., for respondent.
Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.
Petitioner is a national bank located at Gulfport, Harrison county, Miss. The state revenue agent instructed the tax collector for that county as follows:
In obedience to this instruction, the collector entered upon the rolls of his office an assessment to the bank in these words:
Objection was duly offered upon the ground that the corporation was assessed, and not the stockholders, as required by section 5219, Revised Statutes of the United States (Comp. St. 9784). The Harrison county circuit court overruled this and directed the board of supervisors--- [258 U.S. 362, 364] 'to assess the First National Bank of Gulfport, Mississippi, with capital stock, surplus, undivided profits, and any and all property assessable to said bank, in the sum of $75,150, for the years 1903, 1906, and 1907, which said property was at said time owned by said First National Bank, and which had escaped taxation for each of the years as hereinbefore set out; and said board of supervisors is hereby directed to make such assessment by way of additional assessment on the roll and tax list of Harrison county, Mississippi.'
The Supreme Court of the state approved this judgment. See State Revenue Agent v. Bank, 108 Miss. 346, 66 South. 407; Adams v. First National Bank of Gulfport, 116 Miss. 450, 77 South. 195; First National Bank of Gulfport v. Adams, 123 Miss. 279, 85 South 308.
Section 52191 Revised Statutes (copied below), prescribes the full measure of the power of the several states to impose taxes upon national banking associations or their stockholders. Any assessment not in conformity therewith is unauthorized and invalid. Bank of California v. Richardson, 248 U.S. 476, 483 , 39 S. Sup. Ct. 165.
But, as pointed out in Owensboro National Bank v. Owensboro, 173 U.S. 664, 676 , 677 S., 19 Sup. Ct. 537, a tax levied upon a corporation measured by the value of its shares is not equivalent to one upon the shareholders in respect of their shares.
Where the validity of an assessment by officers of the state is properly challenged, and the matter comes here, this court must determine the effect of the thing actually done. What might have been done under the local statute is not controlling. We think it clear that the assessment in the present case was against the corporation and beyond the power of the state definitely delimited by section 5219
The judgment of the court below must be reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
Mr. Justice CLARKE took no part in the consideration or decision of this cause.
[ Footnote 1 ] Nothing herein shall prevent all the shares in any association from being included in the valuation of the personal property of the owner or holder of such shares, in assessing taxes imposed by authority of the state within which the association is located; but the Legislature of each state may determine and direct the manner and place of taxing all the shares of national banking association located within the state, subject only to the two restrictions, that the taxation shall not be at a greater rate than is assessed upon other moneyed capital in the hands of individual citizens of such state, and that the shares of any national banking association owned by non-residents of any state shall be taxed in the city or town where the bank is located, and not elsewhere. Nothing herein shall be construed to exempt the real property of associations from either state, county, or municipal taxes, to the same extent, according to its value, as other real property is taxed.